AsynCorpPty Ltd
Start a conversation
Services

Build, harden, guide.

Three services, one way of working. Whether you are a founder with an idea or a prototype, or an engineering team with a platform to modernise, the work runs on an agentic SDLC and every change is approved by an engineer who is accountable for it.

Way of working
Agentic SDLC, human-reviewed
For
Founders · Product teams · Enterprise
Ownership
You own the code and IP
Service 01

Build

New products and platforms, built with AI agents and human review on every change. Fast to the first release, and still standing at the hundredth.

Who it's for

  • Founders turning an idea into a first product real customers can use and pay for
  • Product and engineering teams that need a new service, integration layer or platform built alongside them

What we deliver

  • A short specification, data model and contracts agreed before any code is generated
  • Working software built in small increments, with agents writing most of the code and an engineer approving every merge
  • Automated tests that prove each feature does what the specification says
  • Hosting on Azure or AWS, defined as code, with a deployment pipeline that blocks anything unsafe
  • Monitoring and alerting from the first release, not after the first outage
  • Documentation and decision records alongside the code, so your next hire can pick it up
Service 02

Harden

Make what you already have production-grade. A prototype built in a weekend and a platform built over twenty years fail for the same reasons, and the fixes come from the same discipline.

Who it's for

  • Founders with a prototype built quickly with AI tools that now needs to handle real users, real data or real money
  • Engineering teams with legacy systems, fragile integrations or hand-built cloud environments that are holding the business back

What we deliver

  • A review of what exists, with risks ranked by impact and by effort to fix
  • Security fixed first: authentication, secrets, data access and dependencies
  • Tests wrapped around existing behaviour before anything is changed
  • Environments rebuilt as code, with pipelines, monitoring and rollback
  • Legacy systems replaced piece by piece, never in one risky cutover: overnight batch jobs become real-time events, and shared databases get clear owners
  • Tangled point-to-point integrations consolidated into one integration layer with agreed contracts
Service 03

Guide

An independent second opinion when a decision is expensive to get wrong: before a raise, before a rebuild, or before your team hands part of its delivery to AI agents.

Who it's for

  • Founders preparing for investor due diligence, hiring a first engineering team, or without a technical co-founder
  • Engineering leaders and boards who need an independent view of an architecture, a vendor's work, or how to adopt an agentic SDLC safely

What we deliver

  • Technical due diligence: architecture, code quality, security and scalability, written for investors and founders alike
  • Independent architecture and cloud reviews of Azure or AWS environments. Findings only, with no delivery agenda attached
  • Fractional CTO and embedded advisory: architecture decisions, hiring, vendor choices and roadmap, a few days a month or more
  • Agentic SDLC adoption for engineering teams: where agents help and where they don't, review and approval rules, pipeline gates, a pilot on real work, and a playbook your team keeps

You receive

  • Written findings ranked by risk, with evidence
  • A plain-language briefing for founders, boards and executives, and a technical one for engineers
  • A clear next step, whether or not it involves us
Agentic SDLC

Agents write. Gates check. People decide.

An agentic software development lifecycle uses AI agents to write and test far more of the code than a team could by hand. It is only as good as the specification it starts from and the gates it has to pass. That is the part we take seriously.

  1. Step 1

    Specify

    People define the outcome, the data and the contracts, so agents aren't left guessing what you meant.

  2. Step 2

    Generate

    Agents write code, tests, infrastructure and documentation in small, reviewable changes.

  3. Step 3

    Verify

    Automated gates check tests, security, dependencies and cost before anything can merge.

  4. Step 4

    Review

    An engineer reads and approves every change. Accountability stays with a person.

  5. Step 5

    Ship and observe

    Small releases, monitored in production, and easy to roll back.

Standards

What every engagement includes.

Speed is only useful if the result can be trusted. These come with every piece of work, whatever its size.

A specification before code

Outcomes, data and interfaces written down and agreed first, so agents and people build the same thing.

A person behind every change

Nothing reaches your main branch without an engineer reading and approving it.

Tests as evidence

Automated tests show that each feature works, and keep showing it after every later change.

Security in the pipeline

Secrets, dependencies and infrastructure are scanned on every change, not once before launch.

Decisions written down

Architecture decisions and documentation kept with the code, so the reasoning outlives the people.

Transparent AI use

Which AI tools are used, and what code or data they can see, is agreed with you before work starts.

How we engage

Four commercial shapes. One standard of work.

Pick the shape that fits the risk you are managing. Most relationships combine them over time: a review that becomes a build, and a build that ends in a handover.

01

Fixed scope

A defined outcome, such as an MVP, a hardening programme or a migration, delivered against agreed milestones at a fixed price.

02

Independent review

Due diligence or an architecture review at a fixed fee. Findings only, and we do not bid for the follow-up work unless you ask.

03

Ongoing advisory

A fractional CTO, or an architect inside your team, on a monthly retainer reviewed quarterly.

04

Handover & enablement

Documentation, runbooks and paired working until your own team owns and runs what we built.

Assurance

What procurement will ask for.

Insurance

Professional indemnity and public liability held and maintained. Certificates of currency available on request.

Australian entity

AsynCorp Pty Ltd, ABN 93 702 206 166, ACN 702 206 166. Contracts directly with founders, companies and government agencies.

Intellectual property

Code, documentation and infrastructure definitions produced for you are assigned to you.

Confidentiality

We sign your non-disclosure agreement before any technical detail is shared.

Procurement formats

Tender and RFP responses, statements of work and fixed-price scopes, in your template or ours.

No hand-offs

The people you meet in the first conversation do the work. No delivery layers, no bench.

FAQ

Questions founders and engineering leaders ask.

If your question isn't here, ask it directly. You will get a plain answer from the people who would do the work.

Ask a question
Will AI write our code?
Much of it, yes. Agents write code, tests and infrastructure under a specification we agree with you, and an engineer reviews and approves every change before it is merged. That is what makes it fast without making it fragile.
Who is accountable for AI-written code?
We are. Every change has a named engineer who approved it, and the same standards apply whether a line was typed or generated.
Do you work with early-stage founders?
Yes. We build first products, harden prototypes and act as a fractional CTO for founders without a technical co-founder. The engagement is sized to the stage you are at.
Who owns the intellectual property?
You do. Code, documentation and infrastructure definitions produced for you are assigned to you.
Can you work within our existing team and tooling?
Yes. We work in your repositories, pipelines and environments, and can introduce agentic practices to your team as we go.
Do you respond to tenders?
Yes. We respond to tenders and requests for proposal, and contract directly with corporate and government entities.
Will you sign an NDA before we share details?
Yes. We will sign your non-disclosure agreement before any technical detail is shared.
Contact

Tell us what you're building, or what needs fixing.

A line or two is enough. We reply within one business day.

Start a conversation