Track record

Proven in sectors where reliability is non-negotiable.

Our work sits behind property platforms, payment flows, insurance systems and government services. Engagements that run for years, embedded with the teams who own the outcome.

Typical engagement: 12–30 months
Delivery model: Embedded within your engineering team
Integration success: 99.99% sustained in production

Outcomes

Representative outcomes.

The measures that matter to the organisations we work with: systems that keep running, systems that get simpler, and teams that end up owning the result.

R-01

99.99%

Integration success rate sustained on a live enterprise SaaS platform with many vendor integrations, measured in production over the life of the engagement.

R-02

20+

Fragmented point-to-point integrations consolidated into a single reusable framework, with agreed contracts and one operational model.

R-03

12–30

Months: typical engagement length, working inside the client's engineering team rather than at arm's length.

Engagements

Representative engagements.

Our clients' systems are confidential, so engagements are described without naming the organisation. Detailed references are available under NDA during procurement.

PropTechIntegration layerMulti-year

Consolidating a multi-vendor SaaS platform onto a single integration framework

A national PropTech platform depended on more than twenty bespoke point-to-point integrations with vendors, partners and internal systems. Each was built differently, monitored differently and failed differently. We designed and delivered a single C#/.NET integration framework with agreed contracts, idempotent messaging and full tracing, then migrated every integration onto it without interrupting live operations.

20+point-to-point integrations consolidated into one reusable framework

99.99%integration success rate sustained in production

1operational model, one set of contracts, one place to look when something fails

Financial servicesLegacy modernisationStaged programme

Moving core back-office processing off .NET Framework without a big-bang cutover

A financial services organisation ran critical back-office processing on a .NET Framework monolith bound to on-premise SQL Server databases. We led a strangler-pattern modernisation to .NET on Azure: publishing change events from the legacy database, moving one bounded context at a time, and reconciling dual-run output at each stage before retiring the old path.

Stagedmigration with explicit exit criteria and rehearsed rollback at every step

Zerobusiness-stopping cutovers across the programme

Event-drivenplatform on Azure that the internal team now extends without us

GovernmentInfrastructure as codeAudit & enablement

Codifying an agency's cloud environments for audit-ready delivery

An agency's Azure environments had been assembled by hand across several years and several teams. We defined the landing zone, workloads and pipelines in Terraform and Bicep, introduced policy-as-code for security and tagging standards, and enabled the internal team to own the platform through structured handover.

100%of environments defined as code and reproducible from version control

Policyguardrails enforced at deploy time, with evidence available for audit

Ownedby the internal team after structured handover and enablement

Measures

What we hold ourselves to.

Reliability, in writing

Success rates and service-level objectives are agreed before build and reported on throughout. Not aspirations, measurements.

Continuity of the business

No business-stopping cutovers. Migrations are staged, rehearsed and reversible, because the organisation has to keep operating while its systems change.

Ownership transferred

Documentation, runbooks and knowledge transfer are deliverables, not favours. An engagement ends when your team owns the platform.

Contact

References are available under NDA.

Tell us what you're building or fixing. If it's a fit, we'll arrange conversations with people who have worked with us.

Start a conversation See services